Liberal MPs Call for Discussion on Justin Trudeau’s Leadership Amidst Internal Debate

Nikita Pradhan
Nikita Pradhan News
6 Min Read
Image From: < a href =

Amidst the gathering of the federal Liberal caucus in Ottawa for its strategic assembly on the Hill, inquiries once more envelop the sentiments of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s parliamentarians regarding his ongoing stewardship.

While the majority of MPs, traversing the threshold of the inaugural day of Liberal caucus sessions, expressed enduring confidence in the prime minister through three electoral cycles, others hinted at the possibility of engaging in dialogue to dispel any uncertainties.

“I perceive that the prime minister still commands substantial credibility among the electorate. Could there be a reevaluation? Perhaps it warrants deliberation,” remarked Michael McLeod, Liberal MP from the Northwest Territories.

He proposed that this assessment could evolve into a customary practice centre for each electoral event, “to ascertain if all MPs maintain that identical dedication.”

McLeod opined that “the passage of time will reveal” the fate of the Liberals following the forthcoming election, highlighting that some of his constituents have voiced curiosity regarding alternative prospects.

“I maintain that the prime minister adeptly upholds the essence of Liberal ideals and remains capable,” he asserted.

Vance Badawey, a Liberal MP from Ontario, conveyed his lack of inclination towards a leadership appraisal presently, focusing instead on the enhancement of his party’s governmental efficiency and eschewing politicking.

We started a poll on our Scoop Canada YouTube channel, seeking our subscribers to vote on their feelings if there are any chances of the Liberal Party winning the election under Justin Trudeau’s leadership. The majority of our subscribers say that they need to appoint someone else. If you feel the same, click to vote here

Scoop Canada Poll

Diverse Perspectives within the Caucus

Patrick Weiler, Liberal MP from British Columbia, advocated for individual autonomy in opinion.

“I possess unwavering faith in the prime minister; my presence here substantiates that confidence,” declared Filomena Tassi, Liberal MP from Ontario.

The discourse surrounding Trudeau’s leadership resurfaced prominently Wednesday after remarks by Ken McDonald, Liberal MP from Newfoundland, during an interview with Radio-Canada, implying a call for leadership scrutiny to enable MPs to deliberate on whether his tenure has elapsed its zenith.

CTV News sought comment from McDonald, yet his office declined an interview request.

In a statement released late Wednesday, McDonald clarified that he has “steadfastly served as a member of the Liberal caucus” since his election in 2015.

“The essence of my recent public remarks did not advocate for a personal plea for a leadership review, and I am not advocating for one presently,” he clarified.

How is Justin Trudeau Hurting The Liberal Party?

“As aforementioned, I attest to the Prime Minister’s astuteness in politics, his adept campaigning, and his continued dedication to the welfare of Canadians. I pledge ongoing support to my caucus peers and the Prime Minister, as I have since 2015.”

This episode isn’t McDonald’s inaugural deviation from party orthodoxy. He garnered attention in October for siding with the Conservatives in opposition to the Liberal government’s carbon tax policy.

Reactions from Party Officials

Chief Government Whip Ruby Sahota alluded to ongoing discussions with McDonald, hinting at a forthcoming clarification regarding his statements while affirming his autonomy in addressing his role within the caucus.

Echoing Sahota, Government House Leader Steven MacKinnon, who formerly occupied Sahota’s position, rebuked McDonald’s stance.

“Mr. McDonald, in my estimation, gravely errs in this regard,” remarked MacKinnon. “He seems to signal his probable non-candidacy as well… while 157 other Liberals are committed to Justin Trudeau.”

“We embark enthusiastically upon a new session,” MacKinnon declared. “We are poised to deliver outcomes for Canadians… and the prime minister is aptly suited to spearhead us through this endeavour.”

Other MPs refrained from comment, passing by inquisitive reporters on Parliament Hill, while some paused to reflect on the inherent tensions within a caucus.

“I’ve been immersed in elected politics for three decades; did I find alignment with every premier or prime minister I served alongside? Certainly not,” articulated Yvonne Jones, MP from Labrador.

“Divergence of viewpoints is inevitable… Am I disheartened by Ken’s stance? Indeed, for there are countless instances, daily, when as a politician representing constituents, unanimity is unattainable, yet we strive fervently to effect change,” she asserted.

Jones emphasized that ultimately, the sole determinants of significance are those manifested on election day.

“His tenure’s continuity or cessation rests with him; however, I firmly subscribe to the values and tenets of this party, transcending any individual,” she concluded.

This episode isn’t the premier occasion where Liberals have voiced uncertainties regarding Trudeau’s ongoing leadership.

In November, amid dwindling poll figures and the ascent of Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, longstanding Liberal Senator Percy Downe suggested that Trudeau might consider stepping aside to facilitate the emergence of a new Liberal party leader preceding the subsequent campaign.

Trudeau, notwithstanding, reiterated his resolve and aspiration to helm the Liberal party into the forthcoming federal election—scheduled for October 2025—despite internal dissent.

Last Updated on by Nikita Pradhan

Share This Article
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *